A Sri Lankan postmaster who refused to serve customers who could not understand English and flew the Union Jack flag outside his home resigned yesterday, saying he had been forced out of his job.
Deva Kumarasiri quit his post at the Sneinton Boulevard post office in Carlton, Nottingham, but said a minority of customers had left him no choice.
The 40-year-old said most of his customers had supported his stance after he revealed he had turned away five people for "wasting time and holding up the queue" by not speaking English.
But he said a minority of customers had launched a petition against him and that he would now move to a different Nottingham post office, although he hopes to return to his original job in the future.
"I was forced out by a small minority of people who don't want to integrate into society," he said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/union-jack-postmaster-quits-1651324.html
YOU DECIDE!
Benny.
Monday, 23 March 2009
Friday, 20 March 2009
Some Justice,,, Rough Ride Getting It!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article5941506.ece
'Islamophobe' head Erica Connor wins Surrey County Council payout.
MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS.
A campaign by two Muslim governors to give Islam a greater presence in a state school played a key part in forcing a successful head from her job.
SHOULDNT HAVE HAPPENED, ITS A BRITISH SCHOOL.
Erica Connor was forced to leave the school because of stress after she was accused of Islamophobia.
WHY? SHE IS BRITISH!
Surrey County Council had failed in its duty to protect her and to intervene when the actions of the governors created problems in the school’s governing body.
WHY? ITS A BRITISH COUNCIL!
over two years, two governors campaigned to make the school more Islamic.
WHY? ITS A BRITISH SCHOOL!
their behaviour had torn apart the school’s governing board.
WHICH WAS BRITISH!
a Muslim convert, tried to stir up disaffection in the community against the school.
WHY? HE WAS BRITISH!
Mumtaz Saleem was verbally abusive in school meetings.
WHY? VERBAL ABUSE IS A CRIME WHATEVER YOUR RELIGION!
the first five years that Mrs Connor was in charge of the school had seen good relations with the local Muslim community and improved results at the school.
BECAUSE SHE IS BRITISH AND NOT DRIVEN BY MISGUIDED RELIGION.
the situation had changed when the two men were elected to the school’s board.
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT BRITISH AND THEY ARE DRIVEN BY RELIGIOUS FANATISISM!
the school’s governing body had become dysfunctional as a result of their behaviour.
BECAUSE WE ARE BRITISH AND WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PICK ON THE MINORITIES.
the authority’s failure to act had led to low morale and stress among staff.
THEY FAILED TO ACT BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF ISLAMAPHOBIA AND RACISM!
The council had shown excessive tolerance for the two governors.
BECAUSE THEIR HANDS WERE TIED BY GOVERNMENT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!
the men had an agenda to increase the role of the Muslim religion in the school.
BECAUSE THEY ARE RELIGIOUS NUTS WHO NEED TO BE DEPORTED!
the authority’s failure to protect Mrs Connor, had led her to suffer serious depression.
COS THEIR HANDS WERE TIED.
“Mr Martin’s and Mr Saleem’s conduct had the effect of tearing apart the governing body, and together with the poor response by the defendants, had as their effect two years of anxiety and low morale for the school staff, stress leading to early retirement for some staff and disruption in the local community with little, if anything, positive to show for it"
AND THE COUNCIL HAD TO ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN OR BE CALLED RACIST.
She was forced to quit her job suffering from depression and with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Ill-health forced her to take early retirement.
THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED TO A BRITISH CITIZEN BY THE HAND OF AN IMMIGRANT WORKER!
Mrs Connor said after the ruling: “The last five years have been a long haul, at great personal cost to myself and my family, so I am thrilled that justice has prevailed. I was subjected to dreadful pressures from a small group of individuals, unrepresentative of the local community, without the support I would have expected from Surrey County Council.”
SHE MUST INDEED BE THRILLED, SHE WAS AWARDED £400,000
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, SHE WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE PREFERRED TO HAVE BEEN LEFT ALONE TO DO THE GOOD JOB SHE WAS DOING.
BECAUSE OF ALL THE STUPID PATHETIC SYMPATHISERS IN THIS COUNTRY, THE NATION AS A WHOLE IS TOO FREAKING FRIGHTENED TO SAY WHAT THEY FEEL.INSTEAD THEY HAVE TO BEAT AROUND THE BUSH AND PUSSYFOOT AROUND ALL THE FOREIGN WORKERS AND ILLEGALS THAT INHABIT OUR ONCE WONDERFULL COUNTRY.
YOU CAN PICTURE THE SCENE,, COUNCIL MEETING, MOTION PUT FORWARD FOR A MAN TO BOMB THE LOCAL PUB,, SOMEONE ASKS WHO IT IS, AND THE REPLY IS "HE IS A MUSLIM FROM THE NEXT TOWN",, AND THE REPLY WILL BE STANDARD,,, "OKAY, MOTION PASSED, HE CAN PLANT HIS BOMB,,, AND WE MUST NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM!!!!!"
WHILE THIS IS ALL GOING ON, TWO OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE JUMPED ON THE TABLE AND ARE HAVING SEX,,,, BUT ITS OKAY,,, "THEY ARE LESBIANS AND ARE PROTECTED BY THE MINORITIES LAWS",,, AND TO CAP IT ALL OFF,,, THE CHAIRMAN IS TAKING IT UP THE ARSE FROM A NIGGER WITH BIG LIPS!
REMEMBER ALL THOSE YEARS AGO,, JIM DAVIDSON TOLD A SMALL JOKE ABOUT A BLACK GUY?
A POLICEMAN IS SITTING IN HIS CAR WITH A RADAR GUN, SUDDENLY A MAN GOES BY ON A BIKE AT HIGH SPEED,,, HE RADIOS IT IN AND HIS SEARGENT SAYS "IS HE BLACK?" AND THE POLICEMAN SAYS "YES" AND THE SEARGENT SAYS "NICK HIM".
THE LESSON IS "IF YOU WERE BLACK YOU WERE MORE LIKELY TO BE NICKED.
THESE DAYS, THAT HAS ALLMOST REVERSED,,,,
ITS NOT THE WHITE GUY WHO GETS ARRESTED, ITS THE BRITISH GUY!
THE LAW HERE IS A TOTAL ASS, JUST LIKE ALL THE LEADERS WHO HAVE ALLOWED ALL THESE LAWS TO BECOME A REALITY.
I AM ASHAMED TO BE BRITISH BECAUSE THE BRITISH PEOPLE ARE SPINELESS BASTARDS WHO CANT STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES.
BRITAIN IS NOW A HAVEN FOR MINORITIES AND AS SUCH WILL NEVER AGAIN BE BRITISH,,,,
UNLESS THERE IS A REVOLUTION AND AN UPRISING, MAYBE WITH A LITTLE CIVIL WAR THROWN IN!
OVER TO YOU SPINELESS PEOPLE, OR EVEN THE NEW BRITISH MUSLIM WANKERS!
Benny.
'Islamophobe' head Erica Connor wins Surrey County Council payout.
MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS.
A campaign by two Muslim governors to give Islam a greater presence in a state school played a key part in forcing a successful head from her job.
SHOULDNT HAVE HAPPENED, ITS A BRITISH SCHOOL.
Erica Connor was forced to leave the school because of stress after she was accused of Islamophobia.
WHY? SHE IS BRITISH!
Surrey County Council had failed in its duty to protect her and to intervene when the actions of the governors created problems in the school’s governing body.
WHY? ITS A BRITISH COUNCIL!
over two years, two governors campaigned to make the school more Islamic.
WHY? ITS A BRITISH SCHOOL!
their behaviour had torn apart the school’s governing board.
WHICH WAS BRITISH!
a Muslim convert, tried to stir up disaffection in the community against the school.
WHY? HE WAS BRITISH!
Mumtaz Saleem was verbally abusive in school meetings.
WHY? VERBAL ABUSE IS A CRIME WHATEVER YOUR RELIGION!
the first five years that Mrs Connor was in charge of the school had seen good relations with the local Muslim community and improved results at the school.
BECAUSE SHE IS BRITISH AND NOT DRIVEN BY MISGUIDED RELIGION.
the situation had changed when the two men were elected to the school’s board.
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT BRITISH AND THEY ARE DRIVEN BY RELIGIOUS FANATISISM!
the school’s governing body had become dysfunctional as a result of their behaviour.
BECAUSE WE ARE BRITISH AND WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PICK ON THE MINORITIES.
the authority’s failure to act had led to low morale and stress among staff.
THEY FAILED TO ACT BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF ISLAMAPHOBIA AND RACISM!
The council had shown excessive tolerance for the two governors.
BECAUSE THEIR HANDS WERE TIED BY GOVERNMENT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!
the men had an agenda to increase the role of the Muslim religion in the school.
BECAUSE THEY ARE RELIGIOUS NUTS WHO NEED TO BE DEPORTED!
the authority’s failure to protect Mrs Connor, had led her to suffer serious depression.
COS THEIR HANDS WERE TIED.
“Mr Martin’s and Mr Saleem’s conduct had the effect of tearing apart the governing body, and together with the poor response by the defendants, had as their effect two years of anxiety and low morale for the school staff, stress leading to early retirement for some staff and disruption in the local community with little, if anything, positive to show for it"
AND THE COUNCIL HAD TO ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN OR BE CALLED RACIST.
She was forced to quit her job suffering from depression and with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Ill-health forced her to take early retirement.
THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED TO A BRITISH CITIZEN BY THE HAND OF AN IMMIGRANT WORKER!
Mrs Connor said after the ruling: “The last five years have been a long haul, at great personal cost to myself and my family, so I am thrilled that justice has prevailed. I was subjected to dreadful pressures from a small group of individuals, unrepresentative of the local community, without the support I would have expected from Surrey County Council.”
SHE MUST INDEED BE THRILLED, SHE WAS AWARDED £400,000
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, SHE WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE PREFERRED TO HAVE BEEN LEFT ALONE TO DO THE GOOD JOB SHE WAS DOING.
BECAUSE OF ALL THE STUPID PATHETIC SYMPATHISERS IN THIS COUNTRY, THE NATION AS A WHOLE IS TOO FREAKING FRIGHTENED TO SAY WHAT THEY FEEL.INSTEAD THEY HAVE TO BEAT AROUND THE BUSH AND PUSSYFOOT AROUND ALL THE FOREIGN WORKERS AND ILLEGALS THAT INHABIT OUR ONCE WONDERFULL COUNTRY.
YOU CAN PICTURE THE SCENE,, COUNCIL MEETING, MOTION PUT FORWARD FOR A MAN TO BOMB THE LOCAL PUB,, SOMEONE ASKS WHO IT IS, AND THE REPLY IS "HE IS A MUSLIM FROM THE NEXT TOWN",, AND THE REPLY WILL BE STANDARD,,, "OKAY, MOTION PASSED, HE CAN PLANT HIS BOMB,,, AND WE MUST NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM!!!!!"
WHILE THIS IS ALL GOING ON, TWO OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE JUMPED ON THE TABLE AND ARE HAVING SEX,,,, BUT ITS OKAY,,, "THEY ARE LESBIANS AND ARE PROTECTED BY THE MINORITIES LAWS",,, AND TO CAP IT ALL OFF,,, THE CHAIRMAN IS TAKING IT UP THE ARSE FROM A NIGGER WITH BIG LIPS!
REMEMBER ALL THOSE YEARS AGO,, JIM DAVIDSON TOLD A SMALL JOKE ABOUT A BLACK GUY?
A POLICEMAN IS SITTING IN HIS CAR WITH A RADAR GUN, SUDDENLY A MAN GOES BY ON A BIKE AT HIGH SPEED,,, HE RADIOS IT IN AND HIS SEARGENT SAYS "IS HE BLACK?" AND THE POLICEMAN SAYS "YES" AND THE SEARGENT SAYS "NICK HIM".
THE LESSON IS "IF YOU WERE BLACK YOU WERE MORE LIKELY TO BE NICKED.
THESE DAYS, THAT HAS ALLMOST REVERSED,,,,
ITS NOT THE WHITE GUY WHO GETS ARRESTED, ITS THE BRITISH GUY!
THE LAW HERE IS A TOTAL ASS, JUST LIKE ALL THE LEADERS WHO HAVE ALLOWED ALL THESE LAWS TO BECOME A REALITY.
I AM ASHAMED TO BE BRITISH BECAUSE THE BRITISH PEOPLE ARE SPINELESS BASTARDS WHO CANT STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES.
BRITAIN IS NOW A HAVEN FOR MINORITIES AND AS SUCH WILL NEVER AGAIN BE BRITISH,,,,
UNLESS THERE IS A REVOLUTION AND AN UPRISING, MAYBE WITH A LITTLE CIVIL WAR THROWN IN!
OVER TO YOU SPINELESS PEOPLE, OR EVEN THE NEW BRITISH MUSLIM WANKERS!
Benny.
Thursday, 19 March 2009
£60000 given to muslim???
Babar Ahmad
£60,000 damages over 'serious attack'?????
its time we looked at this case through the eyes of someone who is fed up with "do-gooders and anti racists" who are along for the ride just for the recognition that they are "anti racist!"
the facts.
Babar Ahmad was subjected to prolonged, repeated assaults and religious insults during arrest in south London
£60,000 damages to a British Muslim after a high court admission that officers had subjected him to "serious, gratuitous and prolonged" attack.
Ahmad was punched, kicked and throttled, the court heard.
this was all done by the police.
Officers stamped on the 34-year-old's feet and repeatedly punched him in the head before he was forced into the Muslim prayer position and they shouted: "Where is your God now? Pray to him."
After a sustained attack, he was forced into the back of a police van, where he was again beaten and punched before being put in a "life-threatening" neck hold and told: "You will remember this day for the rest of your life."
At one stage, one of the officers grabbed his testicles and he was also deliberately wrenched by his handcuffs – a technique known to cause intense pain
"The papers of the case will be referred to the director of public prosecutions for urgent consideration of criminal charges against the officers concerned and for an investigation as to whether events surrounding the mislaid mail sacks constitute evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice."The Met had repeatedly denied the claims, saying officers had used reasonable force during the arrest.
An IPCC investigation in 2007 ended with no action being taken against any officer.
some observations of my own,,,
"IF" the police are guilty of anything,, it is voicing what the british public feel.and indeed, if they did in fact abuse him whilst in detention, the probability exists that he did indeed deserve it.
but what did he do in order to get arrested?
he "raised funds for terrorism!"
OH! thats allright then.
so then, the facts are such that, he raises money for terrorist organisations (in particular, organisations who kill maim and disfugure!) and harbours evil thoughts against the british people.so the police stamp on his foot, beat him up and grab his nuts,,, and he gets £60000????
on the flipside,,,,
he makes money, gives it to the men with the bombs, they blow up a shopping arcade or tube station or a bus, and no one gets anything from the terrorists?many people will suffer horribly as a direct result of what this man has done.
many millions of pounds in repairs and rebuilds could be possible,and many families will be liable to lose family members,,, and he will walk off into the sunset with a smile on his face because he has caused such carnage, and got paid for it!
MY OPINION.
any person who raises even one single penny to fund an atrocity is as guilty as the person who commits the atrocity.
he is lucky he got lumbered with such docile officers.
any normal officer would have made damm sure that he suffered ten times more than he did!even worse, this guy is a "british muslim!"surely by giving money to a cause which will cause carnage and mayhem on british soil is in fact "TREASON?"
why are we hounding the police force over this?
british or not, this guy has chosen the muslim religion.
i am not a religious person, but if this guy wants to practice being a muslim,, send him to a country where muslims reside,, we dont want the likes of him in our country.
that last line opens up another debate,,, i will address it soon!
CLOSING THOUGHTS.
well done to the police.the "genuine" british citizens are proud of you.
only terrorists and sympathisers will be against what you did.
keep up the good work,, lets keep britain for the british.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/18/babar-ahmed-met-police
Benny.
£60,000 damages over 'serious attack'?????
its time we looked at this case through the eyes of someone who is fed up with "do-gooders and anti racists" who are along for the ride just for the recognition that they are "anti racist!"
the facts.
Babar Ahmad was subjected to prolonged, repeated assaults and religious insults during arrest in south London
£60,000 damages to a British Muslim after a high court admission that officers had subjected him to "serious, gratuitous and prolonged" attack.
Ahmad was punched, kicked and throttled, the court heard.
this was all done by the police.
Officers stamped on the 34-year-old's feet and repeatedly punched him in the head before he was forced into the Muslim prayer position and they shouted: "Where is your God now? Pray to him."
After a sustained attack, he was forced into the back of a police van, where he was again beaten and punched before being put in a "life-threatening" neck hold and told: "You will remember this day for the rest of your life."
At one stage, one of the officers grabbed his testicles and he was also deliberately wrenched by his handcuffs – a technique known to cause intense pain
"The papers of the case will be referred to the director of public prosecutions for urgent consideration of criminal charges against the officers concerned and for an investigation as to whether events surrounding the mislaid mail sacks constitute evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice."The Met had repeatedly denied the claims, saying officers had used reasonable force during the arrest.
An IPCC investigation in 2007 ended with no action being taken against any officer.
some observations of my own,,,
"IF" the police are guilty of anything,, it is voicing what the british public feel.and indeed, if they did in fact abuse him whilst in detention, the probability exists that he did indeed deserve it.
but what did he do in order to get arrested?
he "raised funds for terrorism!"
OH! thats allright then.
so then, the facts are such that, he raises money for terrorist organisations (in particular, organisations who kill maim and disfugure!) and harbours evil thoughts against the british people.so the police stamp on his foot, beat him up and grab his nuts,,, and he gets £60000????
on the flipside,,,,
he makes money, gives it to the men with the bombs, they blow up a shopping arcade or tube station or a bus, and no one gets anything from the terrorists?many people will suffer horribly as a direct result of what this man has done.
many millions of pounds in repairs and rebuilds could be possible,and many families will be liable to lose family members,,, and he will walk off into the sunset with a smile on his face because he has caused such carnage, and got paid for it!
MY OPINION.
any person who raises even one single penny to fund an atrocity is as guilty as the person who commits the atrocity.
he is lucky he got lumbered with such docile officers.
any normal officer would have made damm sure that he suffered ten times more than he did!even worse, this guy is a "british muslim!"surely by giving money to a cause which will cause carnage and mayhem on british soil is in fact "TREASON?"
why are we hounding the police force over this?
british or not, this guy has chosen the muslim religion.
i am not a religious person, but if this guy wants to practice being a muslim,, send him to a country where muslims reside,, we dont want the likes of him in our country.
that last line opens up another debate,,, i will address it soon!
CLOSING THOUGHTS.
well done to the police.the "genuine" british citizens are proud of you.
only terrorists and sympathisers will be against what you did.
keep up the good work,, lets keep britain for the british.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/18/babar-ahmed-met-police
Benny.
Friday, 13 March 2009
Time For the Government to Oust all Muslims????
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
PURE EVIL!
AND THEY ARREST OUR GUYS
AND THEY ARREST OUR GUYS
the homecoming of a battalion of troops who have given control of their lives to a sick sad prime minister, come home after a tour of DUTY to be greeted with MUSLIMS chanting crap like "BUTCHERS, MURDERERS, KILLERS" and the list goes on.
and who gets arrested?
the white guy who told them to go home!
how did it come to this?????
thats easy,,, the police gave permission for the muslims to turn out and abuse our boys.
thats right,,, they had permission to abuse our soldiers.
i supose the white guy who got arrested didnt ask permission to call the muslims names!
but if he had asked for permission,,, he would still have been arrested for being racist.
the muslims get away with it because they are a minority!
they complain that soldiers shouldnt parade in a community of muslims,,,,FUCK OFF!
its time we shipped them all out.
not because i am racist,,,, but because i am "ANTI MINORITIST!"
I FRIGGIN HATE MINORITIES.
FROM ME, BENNY,,, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR BRAVE BRITISH SOLDIERS,, EACH AND EVER ONE OF THEM FOR THE SERVICE THEY HAVE DONE FOR THIS COUNTRY.
muslims should watch out.
if this country ever suffered a governmental takeover by the armed forces,,, all immigrants would be shipped out in the interests of national security,,,, a move that this BROWN government are afraid to make!
Brown is happy to turn his back on our troops, and maybe send all of them to their death,,, as long as the muslim in the community doesent have to look at our fairy lights!!!!
maybe we should strap a bomb to every muslim, send it back to where it came from, and blow them all up at the same time,,, then we could say they were having a dry run practice session for a mass bombing and it went tits up,, them we could have street parties and street discos, and get pissed as farts on the success of ridding the world of all its suicide bombers in one fell swoop,,,,,,,,,,,, or is this all a little racist?????
see this story,,,
Benny.
stupid picture alignment!!
Wednesday, 21 January 2009
Interesting Article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1123124/LITTLEJOHN-Getting-noses-guilt-tripping-white-folks.html
i found this article by chance.
i found it interesting.
it shows how the country at large is now wondering wether to say what they think or be quiet like good little english people.
i maintain the fact that i am not racist.
i do hold the belief though that people who are from other countries, be they black white green yellow or blue, should be repatriated to their respective countries.
there was also something important in what barack obama said in his speech.
he said something like,,
"i am not afraid to be an american in my own country"
and i aggree with him.
i will be british in my own country, and if i offend anyone from a minority group who come from another country or religion, TOUGH!
i am who i am and that wont change!
an excerpt from the article on the link above says
The BBC's glowing tributes to Tony Hart, who died at the weekend, somehow overlooked one of his most popular creations for Blue Peter, back in the Sixties - Paki the Elephant.
I can't imagine why.
my thoughts on it are,,,
"we are not allowed to say PAKI you idiot!
Benny.
i found this article by chance.
i found it interesting.
it shows how the country at large is now wondering wether to say what they think or be quiet like good little english people.
i maintain the fact that i am not racist.
i do hold the belief though that people who are from other countries, be they black white green yellow or blue, should be repatriated to their respective countries.
there was also something important in what barack obama said in his speech.
he said something like,,
"i am not afraid to be an american in my own country"
and i aggree with him.
i will be british in my own country, and if i offend anyone from a minority group who come from another country or religion, TOUGH!
i am who i am and that wont change!
an excerpt from the article on the link above says
The BBC's glowing tributes to Tony Hart, who died at the weekend, somehow overlooked one of his most popular creations for Blue Peter, back in the Sixties - Paki the Elephant.
I can't imagine why.
my thoughts on it are,,,
"we are not allowed to say PAKI you idiot!
Benny.
Thursday, 15 January 2009
What Do You Think?
should harry be punished for his racism?
or should he get away with it?
all the anti racists out there are probably screaming for bllod, as are the tree huggers, and anti bomb protesters, etc etc
the royal family take a different view of it all.
charles calls his friend "sooty" as a term of endearment.
"sooty" says that is true and he loves it!
in the 70s, britain had some programs (comedies) on television that were quite racist.
Love thy Neighbour, It aint half hot mum, Jim davidson (chalky), etc etc etc
but it was what made up this country.
lets not forget, there was a time when only British people lived here, with maybe the odd roman, viking or saxon,,,, and okay,, we brought the africans over here to be slaves.
but when we realised that what we were doing was wrong, we should have sent every last one back to their homeland for repatriation.
as such, we would then have reverted back to all whites again.
after that, if any other coloured person came here to live, then they would have to accept our way of life, embrace it, and live by it.
but lets bring it all up to date.
apart from the last few who remained after gaining their freedom, all the other coloured people are here by their own choosing.
so then,, if that is the case (and it is) we should not have to pussyfoot around them just to exist in our own country.
in that event, then harry would not now have a problem, because we would all be using those terms all the time because they would not be here to take offence.
its only because they are here that we have to watch what we say.
its also taken for granted now that even prince philip can make comments about "cowboys and indians and wops and wogs" and its simply put down to his age or his being missinterpreted by the press, deliberatly or otherwise.
so,,, whats the next step for harry???
Benny.
or should he get away with it?
all the anti racists out there are probably screaming for bllod, as are the tree huggers, and anti bomb protesters, etc etc
the royal family take a different view of it all.
charles calls his friend "sooty" as a term of endearment.
"sooty" says that is true and he loves it!
in the 70s, britain had some programs (comedies) on television that were quite racist.
Love thy Neighbour, It aint half hot mum, Jim davidson (chalky), etc etc etc
but it was what made up this country.
lets not forget, there was a time when only British people lived here, with maybe the odd roman, viking or saxon,,,, and okay,, we brought the africans over here to be slaves.
but when we realised that what we were doing was wrong, we should have sent every last one back to their homeland for repatriation.
as such, we would then have reverted back to all whites again.
after that, if any other coloured person came here to live, then they would have to accept our way of life, embrace it, and live by it.
but lets bring it all up to date.
apart from the last few who remained after gaining their freedom, all the other coloured people are here by their own choosing.
so then,, if that is the case (and it is) we should not have to pussyfoot around them just to exist in our own country.
in that event, then harry would not now have a problem, because we would all be using those terms all the time because they would not be here to take offence.
its only because they are here that we have to watch what we say.
its also taken for granted now that even prince philip can make comments about "cowboys and indians and wops and wogs" and its simply put down to his age or his being missinterpreted by the press, deliberatly or otherwise.
so,,, whats the next step for harry???
Benny.
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
Paki? Sooty?
the royals are racist?????
you tell me!
william using the paki word to an asian?
charles using the word sooty to another asian?
lets not forget the germans wanted a super race of blonde haired blue eyed babies!
lets not forget that the windsors are of german descent!
but after all that, the royals will get away from the accusations because of who they are!
i refer you back to big brother and emily parr.
emily used the nigger word.
she was ejected from big brother at 3 am in the morning in her jammies!
i refer you to the 2 black girls on the same show on the same night who also said the nigger word.
and they had no action taken.
i refer again to the same series of big brother but a different night, when liam said the nigger word.
big brother production knew of the "crime" but chose to ignore it.
but to be fair, if they had ejected him it would have spoiled the eviction final, so no action.
in short then, if you are a royal or a german, or a black or asian person, or allmost a winner of a show,,, its okay to say nigger and paki in any context?
so then emily parr's only crime was the fact that she was white!
never mind emily, marry a black afro carribean of asian descent with a jot of german blood, and go back to win big brother, and you too can say stuff like nigger and paki.
alternatively, black yourself up like a minstrel and shout "uber nigger!" and everything will be fine!
you tell me!
william using the paki word to an asian?
charles using the word sooty to another asian?
lets not forget the germans wanted a super race of blonde haired blue eyed babies!
lets not forget that the windsors are of german descent!
but after all that, the royals will get away from the accusations because of who they are!
i refer you back to big brother and emily parr.
emily used the nigger word.
she was ejected from big brother at 3 am in the morning in her jammies!
i refer you to the 2 black girls on the same show on the same night who also said the nigger word.
and they had no action taken.
i refer again to the same series of big brother but a different night, when liam said the nigger word.
big brother production knew of the "crime" but chose to ignore it.
but to be fair, if they had ejected him it would have spoiled the eviction final, so no action.
in short then, if you are a royal or a german, or a black or asian person, or allmost a winner of a show,,, its okay to say nigger and paki in any context?
so then emily parr's only crime was the fact that she was white!
never mind emily, marry a black afro carribean of asian descent with a jot of german blood, and go back to win big brother, and you too can say stuff like nigger and paki.
alternatively, black yourself up like a minstrel and shout "uber nigger!" and everything will be fine!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)