http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article5941506.ece
'Islamophobe' head Erica Connor wins Surrey County Council payout.
MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS.
A campaign by two Muslim governors to give Islam a greater presence in a state school played a key part in forcing a successful head from her job.
SHOULDNT HAVE HAPPENED, ITS A BRITISH SCHOOL.
Erica Connor was forced to leave the school because of stress after she was accused of Islamophobia.
WHY? SHE IS BRITISH!
Surrey County Council had failed in its duty to protect her and to intervene when the actions of the governors created problems in the school’s governing body.
WHY? ITS A BRITISH COUNCIL!
over two years, two governors campaigned to make the school more Islamic.
WHY? ITS A BRITISH SCHOOL!
their behaviour had torn apart the school’s governing board.
WHICH WAS BRITISH!
a Muslim convert, tried to stir up disaffection in the community against the school.
WHY? HE WAS BRITISH!
Mumtaz Saleem was verbally abusive in school meetings.
WHY? VERBAL ABUSE IS A CRIME WHATEVER YOUR RELIGION!
the first five years that Mrs Connor was in charge of the school had seen good relations with the local Muslim community and improved results at the school.
BECAUSE SHE IS BRITISH AND NOT DRIVEN BY MISGUIDED RELIGION.
the situation had changed when the two men were elected to the school’s board.
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT BRITISH AND THEY ARE DRIVEN BY RELIGIOUS FANATISISM!
the school’s governing body had become dysfunctional as a result of their behaviour.
BECAUSE WE ARE BRITISH AND WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PICK ON THE MINORITIES.
the authority’s failure to act had led to low morale and stress among staff.
THEY FAILED TO ACT BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF ISLAMAPHOBIA AND RACISM!
The council had shown excessive tolerance for the two governors.
BECAUSE THEIR HANDS WERE TIED BY GOVERNMENT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!
the men had an agenda to increase the role of the Muslim religion in the school.
BECAUSE THEY ARE RELIGIOUS NUTS WHO NEED TO BE DEPORTED!
the authority’s failure to protect Mrs Connor, had led her to suffer serious depression.
COS THEIR HANDS WERE TIED.
“Mr Martin’s and Mr Saleem’s conduct had the effect of tearing apart the governing body, and together with the poor response by the defendants, had as their effect two years of anxiety and low morale for the school staff, stress leading to early retirement for some staff and disruption in the local community with little, if anything, positive to show for it"
AND THE COUNCIL HAD TO ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN OR BE CALLED RACIST.
She was forced to quit her job suffering from depression and with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Ill-health forced her to take early retirement.
THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED TO A BRITISH CITIZEN BY THE HAND OF AN IMMIGRANT WORKER!
Mrs Connor said after the ruling: “The last five years have been a long haul, at great personal cost to myself and my family, so I am thrilled that justice has prevailed. I was subjected to dreadful pressures from a small group of individuals, unrepresentative of the local community, without the support I would have expected from Surrey County Council.”
SHE MUST INDEED BE THRILLED, SHE WAS AWARDED £400,000
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, SHE WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE PREFERRED TO HAVE BEEN LEFT ALONE TO DO THE GOOD JOB SHE WAS DOING.
BECAUSE OF ALL THE STUPID PATHETIC SYMPATHISERS IN THIS COUNTRY, THE NATION AS A WHOLE IS TOO FREAKING FRIGHTENED TO SAY WHAT THEY FEEL.INSTEAD THEY HAVE TO BEAT AROUND THE BUSH AND PUSSYFOOT AROUND ALL THE FOREIGN WORKERS AND ILLEGALS THAT INHABIT OUR ONCE WONDERFULL COUNTRY.
YOU CAN PICTURE THE SCENE,, COUNCIL MEETING, MOTION PUT FORWARD FOR A MAN TO BOMB THE LOCAL PUB,, SOMEONE ASKS WHO IT IS, AND THE REPLY IS "HE IS A MUSLIM FROM THE NEXT TOWN",, AND THE REPLY WILL BE STANDARD,,, "OKAY, MOTION PASSED, HE CAN PLANT HIS BOMB,,, AND WE MUST NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM!!!!!"
WHILE THIS IS ALL GOING ON, TWO OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE JUMPED ON THE TABLE AND ARE HAVING SEX,,,, BUT ITS OKAY,,, "THEY ARE LESBIANS AND ARE PROTECTED BY THE MINORITIES LAWS",,, AND TO CAP IT ALL OFF,,, THE CHAIRMAN IS TAKING IT UP THE ARSE FROM A NIGGER WITH BIG LIPS!
REMEMBER ALL THOSE YEARS AGO,, JIM DAVIDSON TOLD A SMALL JOKE ABOUT A BLACK GUY?
A POLICEMAN IS SITTING IN HIS CAR WITH A RADAR GUN, SUDDENLY A MAN GOES BY ON A BIKE AT HIGH SPEED,,, HE RADIOS IT IN AND HIS SEARGENT SAYS "IS HE BLACK?" AND THE POLICEMAN SAYS "YES" AND THE SEARGENT SAYS "NICK HIM".
THE LESSON IS "IF YOU WERE BLACK YOU WERE MORE LIKELY TO BE NICKED.
THESE DAYS, THAT HAS ALLMOST REVERSED,,,,
ITS NOT THE WHITE GUY WHO GETS ARRESTED, ITS THE BRITISH GUY!
THE LAW HERE IS A TOTAL ASS, JUST LIKE ALL THE LEADERS WHO HAVE ALLOWED ALL THESE LAWS TO BECOME A REALITY.
I AM ASHAMED TO BE BRITISH BECAUSE THE BRITISH PEOPLE ARE SPINELESS BASTARDS WHO CANT STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES.
BRITAIN IS NOW A HAVEN FOR MINORITIES AND AS SUCH WILL NEVER AGAIN BE BRITISH,,,,
UNLESS THERE IS A REVOLUTION AND AN UPRISING, MAYBE WITH A LITTLE CIVIL WAR THROWN IN!
OVER TO YOU SPINELESS PEOPLE, OR EVEN THE NEW BRITISH MUSLIM WANKERS!
Benny.
Friday, 20 March 2009
Thursday, 19 March 2009
£60000 given to muslim???
Babar Ahmad
£60,000 damages over 'serious attack'?????
its time we looked at this case through the eyes of someone who is fed up with "do-gooders and anti racists" who are along for the ride just for the recognition that they are "anti racist!"
the facts.
Babar Ahmad was subjected to prolonged, repeated assaults and religious insults during arrest in south London
£60,000 damages to a British Muslim after a high court admission that officers had subjected him to "serious, gratuitous and prolonged" attack.
Ahmad was punched, kicked and throttled, the court heard.
this was all done by the police.
Officers stamped on the 34-year-old's feet and repeatedly punched him in the head before he was forced into the Muslim prayer position and they shouted: "Where is your God now? Pray to him."
After a sustained attack, he was forced into the back of a police van, where he was again beaten and punched before being put in a "life-threatening" neck hold and told: "You will remember this day for the rest of your life."
At one stage, one of the officers grabbed his testicles and he was also deliberately wrenched by his handcuffs – a technique known to cause intense pain
"The papers of the case will be referred to the director of public prosecutions for urgent consideration of criminal charges against the officers concerned and for an investigation as to whether events surrounding the mislaid mail sacks constitute evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice."The Met had repeatedly denied the claims, saying officers had used reasonable force during the arrest.
An IPCC investigation in 2007 ended with no action being taken against any officer.
some observations of my own,,,
"IF" the police are guilty of anything,, it is voicing what the british public feel.and indeed, if they did in fact abuse him whilst in detention, the probability exists that he did indeed deserve it.
but what did he do in order to get arrested?
he "raised funds for terrorism!"
OH! thats allright then.
so then, the facts are such that, he raises money for terrorist organisations (in particular, organisations who kill maim and disfugure!) and harbours evil thoughts against the british people.so the police stamp on his foot, beat him up and grab his nuts,,, and he gets £60000????
on the flipside,,,,
he makes money, gives it to the men with the bombs, they blow up a shopping arcade or tube station or a bus, and no one gets anything from the terrorists?many people will suffer horribly as a direct result of what this man has done.
many millions of pounds in repairs and rebuilds could be possible,and many families will be liable to lose family members,,, and he will walk off into the sunset with a smile on his face because he has caused such carnage, and got paid for it!
MY OPINION.
any person who raises even one single penny to fund an atrocity is as guilty as the person who commits the atrocity.
he is lucky he got lumbered with such docile officers.
any normal officer would have made damm sure that he suffered ten times more than he did!even worse, this guy is a "british muslim!"surely by giving money to a cause which will cause carnage and mayhem on british soil is in fact "TREASON?"
why are we hounding the police force over this?
british or not, this guy has chosen the muslim religion.
i am not a religious person, but if this guy wants to practice being a muslim,, send him to a country where muslims reside,, we dont want the likes of him in our country.
that last line opens up another debate,,, i will address it soon!
CLOSING THOUGHTS.
well done to the police.the "genuine" british citizens are proud of you.
only terrorists and sympathisers will be against what you did.
keep up the good work,, lets keep britain for the british.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/18/babar-ahmed-met-police
Benny.
£60,000 damages over 'serious attack'?????
its time we looked at this case through the eyes of someone who is fed up with "do-gooders and anti racists" who are along for the ride just for the recognition that they are "anti racist!"
the facts.
Babar Ahmad was subjected to prolonged, repeated assaults and religious insults during arrest in south London
£60,000 damages to a British Muslim after a high court admission that officers had subjected him to "serious, gratuitous and prolonged" attack.
Ahmad was punched, kicked and throttled, the court heard.
this was all done by the police.
Officers stamped on the 34-year-old's feet and repeatedly punched him in the head before he was forced into the Muslim prayer position and they shouted: "Where is your God now? Pray to him."
After a sustained attack, he was forced into the back of a police van, where he was again beaten and punched before being put in a "life-threatening" neck hold and told: "You will remember this day for the rest of your life."
At one stage, one of the officers grabbed his testicles and he was also deliberately wrenched by his handcuffs – a technique known to cause intense pain
"The papers of the case will be referred to the director of public prosecutions for urgent consideration of criminal charges against the officers concerned and for an investigation as to whether events surrounding the mislaid mail sacks constitute evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice."The Met had repeatedly denied the claims, saying officers had used reasonable force during the arrest.
An IPCC investigation in 2007 ended with no action being taken against any officer.
some observations of my own,,,
"IF" the police are guilty of anything,, it is voicing what the british public feel.and indeed, if they did in fact abuse him whilst in detention, the probability exists that he did indeed deserve it.
but what did he do in order to get arrested?
he "raised funds for terrorism!"
OH! thats allright then.
so then, the facts are such that, he raises money for terrorist organisations (in particular, organisations who kill maim and disfugure!) and harbours evil thoughts against the british people.so the police stamp on his foot, beat him up and grab his nuts,,, and he gets £60000????
on the flipside,,,,
he makes money, gives it to the men with the bombs, they blow up a shopping arcade or tube station or a bus, and no one gets anything from the terrorists?many people will suffer horribly as a direct result of what this man has done.
many millions of pounds in repairs and rebuilds could be possible,and many families will be liable to lose family members,,, and he will walk off into the sunset with a smile on his face because he has caused such carnage, and got paid for it!
MY OPINION.
any person who raises even one single penny to fund an atrocity is as guilty as the person who commits the atrocity.
he is lucky he got lumbered with such docile officers.
any normal officer would have made damm sure that he suffered ten times more than he did!even worse, this guy is a "british muslim!"surely by giving money to a cause which will cause carnage and mayhem on british soil is in fact "TREASON?"
why are we hounding the police force over this?
british or not, this guy has chosen the muslim religion.
i am not a religious person, but if this guy wants to practice being a muslim,, send him to a country where muslims reside,, we dont want the likes of him in our country.
that last line opens up another debate,,, i will address it soon!
CLOSING THOUGHTS.
well done to the police.the "genuine" british citizens are proud of you.
only terrorists and sympathisers will be against what you did.
keep up the good work,, lets keep britain for the british.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/18/babar-ahmed-met-police
Benny.
Labels:
Babar Ahmad,
bomber,
british,
muslim,
racist
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
